We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case law is specific on the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For instance, a ruling within a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
In that sense, case regulation differs from a single jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Ny would not be decided using case law from California. Instead, Big apple courts will analyze the issue counting on binding precedent . If no previous decisions within the issue exist, Big apple courts may well look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority somewhat than binding authority. Other factors including how aged the decision is as well as closeness on the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common law.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release being a legally regarded conviction. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Because the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and competently.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation consists of the names of your parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was read, the date it had been decided, as well as the book in which it's recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
Summaries supply an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and policies geared toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[4]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to read more disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.